It is good to give a humansound definition of  ‘ego’.

Probably each individual has his or her own definition of ego. Humansound is one of the seven ecodomains within Novaglobe and stands for the arts and science on healing and happiness of people and the earth.

The humansound way of seeing the Universe

The most important thing to note, is that it nearly always has a negative connotation. As being something to get rid off. Even Buddhism states –as far as one can generalize- that we should let the ego vanish, to reach enlightment. To start with the latter: within the humansound philosophy there is no such thing as ‘enlightment’ (as a sort of state).The path is the goal is what ‘is’. So traveling, moving, changing is sound. Getting lighter, is an expression used within humansound. Not enlightment as solid state.

And the whole world can become lighter, more harmonized. In such it takes distance from thinkings that there is ‘balanced’ duality, and that there is always as much badness and suffering in the world as there is goodness and happiness. Yes, you can only feel happy if you know sadness.

But as a whole the ‘thing’ can become less sad.

In such the humansound way of viewing it aligns with the quantum leap theory by Ervin Laszlo [2012, The chaos point book]. We can migrate to a gooder world, with far less suffering for all.

Striving for enlightment is considered to be a delusion, as it is to strive to a sort of ‘heaven’ as another place. Strive for a lighter world for you and your earth fellows. Each step in which you contribute in this, will make your world, and being a bit lighter. And, as explained in the creamation concept, bringing goodness is the essence of your creation power. And your life elixer.

Humansound likes the model of seeing your physical body as a ‘cloud’ of energy and vibrations, modulated on the ‘Akasha field’ (Ervin Laszlo term). Quantum physic drives this model as well [See the book ‘Whole Elephant’, Marja de Vries and ‘What the Bleep do we Know’, movie].

If it is disharmonic, the shape of the harmonism is not nice…

About the word ‘Harmonism’, ones energetic body

This ‘cloud’ is named ‘harmonism’. If this oscilating ‘body’ has a nice vibration, it feels as a tuned guitar. An orchestra sounding nice. Comparisons apply often: two people who are not ‘nice’ for each other, have probably a different ‘tuning’. Imagine two guitars tuned in a different way, the make not a nice harmony together as well. The only thing what will help is to understand this difference of being and not blaming it. Read [The Normal Personality, Stephen Reiss]. If understanding each other or trying to change / tune does not work, only one thing works: more distance. In such both humans, harmonisms, can make their own sound without annoying the other.

But… the humans are always connected via the waves, frequencies they transmit and the field connecting them. This is an expression of the one feeling and essence. This connecting tone can be seen as an expression of ‘god’ or the ‘all’. Giving god names is not good. Do not make an icon (Mozes).

Four body model

And, next to this, the humansound  philosophy uses the ‘four body model’, common in Buddhistic viewings: Physical body, Rationale (also often named ‘mind’), Emotion and Soul. All these bodies can be modelled as different harmonisms, but resonating together, making the total human being.

These different bodies can be also disharmonic towards each other. Emotion versus physical body for instance.  Each divergence can manifest itself via things we now call sicknesses and so.

The more each body on itself is harmonic, and the different bodies are harmonic with each other, the ‘ lighter’ the combined body is.

This will result in people expressing their true colors (recall Cyndi Lauper song). And who know and feel their true emotions. Without these emotions overwhelming them. And understand rationally the world, the system. The more people are harmonic in this sense, the more ‘humansound’ they are. A sort of synonime often used is ‘conscious’. The disadvantage of this term is that it focuses on the rationale: while the total body harmony is the essence.

You cannot be sound, when your physical body is ill. Poisoning your body with smoking for instance is not humansound.  Smoking -by the way- is seen as an expression of stress of the body (especially the emotional and soul body) for being in a unearthed and disharmonic situation: It does not live its vocal, the ‘system’ is jamming it, it may not express the deepest desires, it is not free to flow and change, etc.

So, now, what about the ego?

Within humansound the ego is seen as the identifier of the harmonism. And the ‘I’ feeling. In such is not a bad thing. What is a bad thing, is that all kinds of destructive emotions, habits, not seeing clear, etc. can exist in the harmonism. So, it is more senseful to talk about a ‘destructive tuned’ ego, than saying that he she or she still has an ego.

The more harmonized once being is, the more good it is, expressed via living for instance the goodvalues, see the Novaglobe book for a definition (in two words: live respect and love).

Next to the level of harmonization of one’s being, is the level of energy (or in wave terms: the amplitude) can differ per being. This is the power of a human. Interesting to note: I saw a documentary lately. In Dutch was stated ‘This person has a big ego’. The English words were ‘This person has a strong character’. Being a strong character is not necessarily negative.

If somebody has a huge ego, there is no problem, as long as it is tuned constructive.

And it is even nicer: I hope that everyone around me has a huge ego. A strong character. An being fully in their groove. As long as they are well harmonized. In such, that world will be better for me to live in, than without those people: they will help me when I need help. They will try to lift me up to my maximum potential, talents and happiness.

As soon as destructive emotions take over (destructicons) a huge ego becomes extremely dangerous for itself and its habitat (think of Hitler).Fear, manifestation drift, etc. dominated him. Not love, forgiveness, not hurting people, etc.

Related topics:

1. Mind over matter, the will.
2. God or viewpoints on a thing named ‘god’.
3. Emotude (arts of Emotions).
4. Emotions, role of.
5. Vocale, destiny, pre destination theory, Groove.
6. Belief.
7. Book: Destructive Emotions (and how to heal them),  Daniel Goleman, Dalai Lama.
8. Book: Earth Honouring, Robert Lawlor.

—

Wimantic URI – Single point of definition: http://www.iwanjka.com/2011/12/ego-wimantic